Young men, old men, visions & dreams
in Kerygmania
In a prophecy in the book of Joel (), quoted in Acts (), we are told "Old men will dream dreams and young men will see visions."
Is this mere parallelism, or is there something different bsetween the aged and the young, and between dreams and visions, that causes the aged to have dreams, and the young to have visions? Is this a distinction without a difference, or is there something going on with the distribution of prophetic experiences?
And if there is a difference, what is it? What makes dreams appropriate for geezers and visions appropriate for their grandchildren?
Is this mere parallelism, or is there something different bsetween the aged and the young, and between dreams and visions, that causes the aged to have dreams, and the young to have visions? Is this a distinction without a difference, or is there something going on with the distribution of prophetic experiences?
And if there is a difference, what is it? What makes dreams appropriate for geezers and visions appropriate for their grandchildren?
Comments
I think there are a couple of things going on here. “[Y]our old men shall dream dreams, and your young men shall see visions.” I think this is parallelism. I’d be interested in the Hebrew to know whether there’s a meaningful difference between “dreams” and “visions,” or whether they would have been seen as facets of the same phenomenon.
But part of the reason I thought it worth quoting the whole thing is to see the inclusion of women and slaves. To me that indicates an inclusive nature, even a radically inclusive nature, to what’s going on. There is foreshadowing of “[t]here is neither Jew nor Greek, nor slave nor free, nor male nor female.”
Whatever it is going on, everyone will share in it.
I don’t know. I still suspect both words are being used to describe basically the same thing.
I know the saying -
“A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in”
But still ...
I will say that the waking visions seem to be much more... emphatic? And rarer, or so it seems.
There is a stage called hypnagogia between sleeping and waking, and it can involve dreaming or hallucinating, whatever you want to call it. It means that you have to be careful with discernment not to mistake the merely natural for more than that.
I have heard a sermon about the "all flesh" part, where the preacher emphasised that it didn't say "all people" and we'd better look out for some prophesying cats and dogs in the last days. He wasn't serious. At least I don't think so...
On a more serious note, I've heard the "all flesh" part emphasised to mean "not just those we consider our own people" or even "not just Christians".
Which doesnt mean that there isnt an interesting distinction between Hebrew dreams and visions (and in any case the bible doesn't have to fit in with my aesthetics).