Maybe GB News should be concentrating on attacking Wes Streeting for taking up the stupidity we're seeing in the US at the moment, attacking the NHS for trying to remove bias in staff appointments through diversity and inclusion programmes, and attacking the excellent staff appointed from non-white ethnicities, and attacking so-called "woke" culture in the health service that seeks to treat all people with respect and dignity regardless of their gender and sexuality.
Maybe GB News should be concentrating on attacking Wes Streeting for taking up the stupidity we're seeing in the US at the moment, attacking the NHS for trying to remove bias in staff appointments through diversity and inclusion programmes, and attacking the excellent staff appointed from non-white ethnicities, and attacking so-called "woke" culture in the health service that seeks to treat all people with respect and dignity regardless of their gender and sexuality.
That should be automatic. You shouldn't need to employ people on vast salaries to keep an eye on it. All we need is equality
Maybe GB News should be concentrating on attacking Wes Streeting for taking up the stupidity we're seeing in the US at the moment, attacking the NHS for trying to remove bias in staff appointments through diversity and inclusion programmes, and attacking the excellent staff appointed from non-white ethnicities, and attacking so-called "woke" culture in the health service that seeks to treat all people with respect and dignity regardless of their gender and sexuality.
That should be automatic. You shouldn't need to employ people on vast salaries to keep an eye on it. All we need is equality
When 25% of the public are saying they'd vote for a known racist homophobe it's kind of obvious that some people have those attitudes and take them into the workplace. Plus, you were a police officer, how is it you don't understand that workplaces left unchecked can breed racism, homophobia and misogyny?
Aye, we shouldn't need to employ people to do this (I doubt they're on "vast salaries" any more than NHS admin staff are, despite common belief) because people shouldn't be arseholes, but people unfortunately are arseholes, so we do.
That should be automatic. You shouldn't need to employ people on vast salaries to keep an eye on it. All we need is equality
When something should be automatic, but is not actually happening, you need people to make sure it happens.
You might think that it would be "automatic" that people would wear the appropriate safety gear when they're about to do something with the real possibility of danger, but experience tells us that if you don't continually check that they are wearing the necessary safety gear, you'll end up with a lot of people not wearing it.
That should be automatic. You shouldn't need to employ people on vast salaries to keep an eye on it. All we need is equality
When something should be automatic, but is not actually happening, you need people to make sure it happens.
You might think that it would be "automatic" that people would wear the appropriate safety gear when they're about to do something with the real possibility of danger, but experience tells us that if you don't continually check that they are wearing the necessary safety gear, you'll end up with a lot of people not wearing it.
Or data protection and ICT security. Some people need to be reminded constantly and they still screw it up repeatedly.
Maybe GB News should be concentrating on attacking Wes Streeting for taking up the stupidity we're seeing in the US at the moment, attacking the NHS for trying to remove bias in staff appointments through diversity and inclusion programmes, and attacking the excellent staff appointed from non-white ethnicities, and attacking so-called "woke" culture in the health service that seeks to treat all people with respect and dignity regardless of their gender and sexuality.
That should be automatic. You shouldn't need to employ people on vast salaries to keep an eye on it. All we need is equality
When 25% of the public are saying they'd vote for a known racist homophobe it's kind of obvious that some people have those attitudes and take them into the workplace.
You can only police what people do, rather than how they think.
Plus, you were a police officer, how is it you don't understand that workplaces left unchecked can breed racism, homophobia and misogyny?
It was my job to make sure it wasn't left unchecked. That and everything else I had to do.
That should be automatic. You shouldn't need to employ people on vast salaries to keep an eye on it. All we need is equality
When something should be automatic, but is not actually happening, you need people to make sure it happens.
You might think that it would be "automatic" that people would wear the appropriate safety gear when they're about to do something with the real possibility of danger, but experience tells us that if you don't continually check that they are wearing the necessary safety gear, you'll end up with a lot of people not wearing it.
As someone who works in professional kitchens I have to have proper protective wear. From chef’s jackets to goggles and gloves using string cleaning chemicals. I have seen so many people not wearing the correct stuff and getting hurt. People will cut corners
That should be automatic. You shouldn't need to employ people on vast salaries to keep an eye on it. All we need is equality
When something should be automatic, but is not actually happening, you need people to make sure it happens.
You might think that it would be "automatic" that people would wear the appropriate safety gear when they're about to do something with the real possibility of danger, but experience tells us that if you don't continually check that they are wearing the necessary safety gear, you'll end up with a lot of people not wearing it.
As someone who works in professional kitchens I have to have proper protective wear. From chef’s jackets to goggles and gloves using string cleaning chemicals. I have seen so many people not wearing the correct stuff and getting hurt. People will cut corners
That should be automatic. You shouldn't need to employ people on vast salaries to keep an eye on it. All we need is equality
When something should be automatic, but is not actually happening, you need people to make sure it happens.
You might think that it would be "automatic" that people would wear the appropriate safety gear when they're about to do something with the real possibility of danger, but experience tells us that if you don't continually check that they are wearing the necessary safety gear, you'll end up with a lot of people not wearing it.
So? The only problem with people getting hurt while choosing to not use the right safety equipment is how they try to sue all and sundry afterwards, as if it’s not their fault they did something stupid that they’d been told not to do. Health and Safety law should be about preventing employers from ordering or forcing their employees to take stupid risks, not banning people from being lazy or doing stupid things (at their own risk) if they want to.
It's not the "only problem". Other people have to clean up the mess, sometimes quite literally. And also economically in costs to business while people are off work or being replaced, invalidity benefits, NHS costs and so on and so forth.
I know there is a specific thread for Birthdays and other anniversaries and significant dates but I did not think that this post would be appropriate in there.
Yesterday GB News celebrated 11 February 1975 the 50th anniversary of the 'Blessed Margaret' becoming party leader against all odds.
I know there is a specific thread for Birthdays and other anniversaries and significant dates but I did not think that this post would be appropriate in there.
Yesterday GB News celebrated 11 February 1975 the 50th anniversary of the 'Blessed Margaret' becoming party leader against all odds.
This thread is in Hell. It's not for general mention of what was on the channel. It's for venting about that part of its output that comes straight from Satan's bottom.
This thread is in Hell. It's not for general mention of what was on the channel. It's for venting about that part of its output that comes straight from Satan's bottom.
So in a thread about GB News, you think that the programme content should not be mentioned ?
This thread is in Hell. It's not for general mention of what was on the channel. It's for venting about that part of its output that comes straight from Satan's bottom.
So in a thread about GB News, you think that the programme content should not be mentioned ?
I suppose there's a certain appropriateness to mention of the Apollion of British Industry in Heĺl.
Comments
I am guessing that you might be addressing these questions to me.
It doesn't bother me when someone better replaces someone who misbehaves
I agree that it is foolish to employ someone who has a reputation for being a loose cannon
Like the current Labour MPs
Whataboutery.
Think you'll find most people here quite critical of Labour on any number of fronts.
You have to admit though there is a comparison to be made.
That should be automatic. You shouldn't need to employ people on vast salaries to keep an eye on it. All we need is equality
Not really. The selection of parliamentary candidates is completely different from directly appointing an employee
True but we are talking about sacking public figures first doing bad things not their method of employment.
When 25% of the public are saying they'd vote for a known racist homophobe it's kind of obvious that some people have those attitudes and take them into the workplace. Plus, you were a police officer, how is it you don't understand that workplaces left unchecked can breed racism, homophobia and misogyny?
When something should be automatic, but is not actually happening, you need people to make sure it happens.
You might think that it would be "automatic" that people would wear the appropriate safety gear when they're about to do something with the real possibility of danger, but experience tells us that if you don't continually check that they are wearing the necessary safety gear, you'll end up with a lot of people not wearing it.
Or data protection and ICT security. Some people need to be reminded constantly and they still screw it up repeatedly.
As someone who works in professional kitchens I have to have proper protective wear. From chef’s jackets to goggles and gloves using string cleaning chemicals. I have seen so many people not wearing the correct stuff and getting hurt. People will cut corners
And their hands....
So? The only problem with people getting hurt while choosing to not use the right safety equipment is how they try to sue all and sundry afterwards, as if it’s not their fault they did something stupid that they’d been told not to do. Health and Safety law should be about preventing employers from ordering or forcing their employees to take stupid risks, not banning people from being lazy or doing stupid things (at their own risk) if they want to.
Yesterday GB News celebrated 11 February 1975 the 50th anniversary of the 'Blessed Margaret' becoming party leader against all odds.
A day that will go down in infamy.
Infamy, infamy, they've all got it infamy!
So in a thread about GB News, you think that the programme content should not be mentioned ?
I suppose there's a certain appropriateness to mention of the Apollion of British Industry in Heĺl.
Also keen on combatting climate change.
I totally agree.
You know what I mean
-- chrisstiles, Hell Host