Christian minorities in predominantly Muslim countries

A right-wing Christian friend of mine (!) both supports Open Doors International, an organisation which says it serves persecuted Christians worldwide, and insists we are at risk of a Muslim takeover in the U.K. unless everyone conforms to our cultural norms. To his credit, he’s a long way short of being as extreme as one of our local far right activists who proudly displays a banner with the words “F**k Islam. Jesus is King”!
A quick Google search shows there are active but small congregations scattered around Pakistan, for example, and I am concerned whether displays of Christian nationalism in the West is making life more difficult for them. I am interested to hear whether there is any evidence that increasing criticism of Islam here (U.K.) is contributing to an increased intolerance of Christian minorities overseas. Intuitively I feel that must be the case, but can anyone share any actual examples?

Comments

  • PomonaPomona Shipmate
    I don't think most Muslims in Muslim-majority countries know or care about far-right commentators in the UK being Islamophobic. I don't think it has much impact unlike US and UK military action - the US bombing of the girls' school in Iran will have a much bigger impact, for instance. Also, the Muslim world is huge and diverse. Palestine is a Muslim-majority country, but the Christian population is also mostly Arab and is united with the Muslim population for obvious reasons. In the UAE, there are obviously many human rights violations but levels of religious tolerance are pretty good due to the dependence on Western companies - discrimination is generally based on race and class and gender rather than religion. Christians and Muslims in India frequently work together in resistance to Hindu nationalism.

    There is a long history of Christian and Muslim coexistance - I think assuming that all majority-Muslim countries persecute Christians is unhelpful and perpetuates further Islamophobia (although I recognise your genuine concern and that it was driven by worry for persecuted groups). Your friend is wrong and a bigot, but I don't think their bigotry is likely to harm Christians overseas.
  • ArethosemyfeetArethosemyfeet Shipmate, Heaven Host
    The position of Christians in some predominantly Muslim countries seems to somewhat resemble the position of Jews in Europe in earlier centuries - not quite systematic persecution, but susceptibility to false accusations (blasphemy in Pakistan, for example). The position of converts to Christianity is often significantly more precarious.
  • Barnabas62Barnabas62 Shipmate, Host Emeritus
    Amnesty International also documents the persecution of Christians while at the same time being heavily criticised by right wing Christian groups over some of its policies eg the decriminalisation of abortion.

    The persecution of Christian minorities in predominantly Muslim countries is a documented fact. That fact should not be used to support Islamaphobic tendencies. Wherever they may be found.
  • HugalHugal Shipmate
    Christian converts from Religion if you include Christian converts from Islam things change. An ex vicar of mine went to lead the Anglican Church in Oman. Christians from outside were tolerated because the King went to university in the UK. He said conversion from Islam was illegal and the church was being watched by the government.
  • PomonaPomona Shipmate
    Barnabas62 wrote: »
    Amnesty International also documents the persecution of Christians while at the same time being heavily criticised by right wing Christian groups over some of its policies eg the decriminalisation of abortion.

    The persecution of Christian minorities in predominantly Muslim countries is a documented fact. That fact should not be used to support Islamaphobic tendencies. Wherever they may be found.

    The persecution of Christians in some majority-Muslim countries. Also, Christians may be persecuted in some mostly-Muslim countries for reasons other than their faith - not suggesting at all that this makes it OK, but that numbers can sometimes be skewed.
  • PomonaPomona Shipmate
    The position of Christians in some predominantly Muslim countries seems to somewhat resemble the position of Jews in Europe in earlier centuries - not quite systematic persecution, but susceptibility to false accusations (blasphemy in Pakistan, for example). The position of converts to Christianity is often significantly more precarious.

    Yes, this is a good point wrt converts.
  • Barnabas62Barnabas62 Shipmate, Host Emeritus
    Pomona

    OK, some. I didn’t mean all.
  • Gramps49Gramps49 Shipmate
    Many years ago, I worked for The Lutheran Hour. We were broadcasting an Arabic version our of Ethiopia into the surrounding Arab countries. We did a survey in some of those countries to see if the intended audience was listening to it. The first survey did not come back well. We then did another survey using the voice of the Arabic translator. That survey indicated quite a few people were hearing his voice. We concluded while the people could not formally admit they had been listening to the program, they were indeed listening.

    I wonder if it is the case now.

    My son spent a year in Palestine just a few short years ago. Before Israel was formed half of Palestine had been Christian, but when Israel caused the Nakba many Christians went into a diaspora throughout Europe and the United States. Now there are no more than 50,000 Christians left.

    Here in the US, we have had a number of Muslims going into our political system. As they gain more representation it will be interesting to see how out attitude toward Israel and the rest of the Middle East. Mandani has reportedly indicated if he could he would like to arrest Nintenyahu should he come to New York. Nintenyahu, of course, has diplomatic immunity,

    However, long term, I do not see any significant changes in the way the US is governed.
  • A right-wing Christian friend of mine (!) both supports Open Doors International, an organisation which says it serves persecuted Christians worldwide, and insists we are at risk of a Muslim takeover in the U.K. unless everyone conforms to our cultural norms. To his credit, he’s a long way short of being as extreme as one of our local far right activists who proudly displays a banner with the words “F**k Islam. Jesus is King”!
    A quick Google search shows there are active but small congregations scattered around Pakistan, for example, and I am concerned whether displays of Christian nationalism in the West is making life more difficult for them. I am interested to hear whether there is any evidence that increasing criticism of Islam here (U.K.) is contributing to an increased intolerance of Christian minorities overseas. Intuitively I feel that must be the case, but can anyone share any actual examples?

    A long time ago, a friend of mine who had grown up in Beirut had a Dad who was an expert in Christian / Muslim relations, and who wrote on the plight of Muslim 'apostates' amongst other things. He might be worth a read if you are interested - Colin Chapman.
  • stetsonstetson Shipmate
    edited July 23
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    Many years ago, I worked for The Lutheran Hour. We were broadcasting an Arabic version our of Ethiopia into the surrounding Arab countries. We did a survey in some of those countries to see if the intended audience was listening to it. The first survey did not come back well. We then did another survey using the voice of the Arabic translator. That survey indicated quite a few people were hearing his voice. We concluded while the people could not formally admit they had been listening to the program, they were indeed listening.

    I'm not exactly clear about the procedure you're describing here. First off, these were telephone surveys, or surveys conducted via the broadcasts themselves?

    And in the second round of surveys, you mean it was the same voice they heard on the broadcasts asking the question about whether or not people listened to the broadcasts?

    And does "people could not formally admit they had been listening to the program" mean they were afraid of retaliation from the authorities? And, if so, how did having the translator himself reading the questions make a difference? Was it that people recognized his voice, so figured that the survey was coming from The Lutheran Hour, not from anti-Lutheran Hour parties?
  • I suspect the main danger (as so commonly, around the world) comes from within the family--and then from neighbors.
  • stetsonstetson Shipmate
    I suspect the main danger (as so commonly, around the world) comes from within the family--and then from neighbors.

    Then how does it matter who's asking the questions in the survey?
  • Gramps49Gramps49 Shipmate
    stetson wrote: »
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    Many years ago, I worked for The Lutheran Hour. We were broadcasting an Arabic version our of Ethiopia into the surrounding Arab countries. We did a survey in some of those countries to see if the intended audience was listening to it. The first survey did not come back well. We then did another survey using the voice of the Arabic translator. That survey indicated quite a few people were hearing his voice. We concluded while the people could not formally admit they had been listening to the program, they were indeed listening.

    I'm not exactly clear about the procedure you're describing here. First off, these were telephone surveys, or surveys conducted via the broadcasts themselves?

    And in the second round of surveys, you mean it was the same voice they heard on the broadcasts asking the question about whether or not people listened to the broadcasts?

    And does "people could not formally admit they had been listening to the program" mean they were afraid of retaliation from the authorities? And, if so, how did having the translator himself reading the questions make a difference? Was it that people recognized his voice, so figured that the survey was coming from The Lutheran Hour, not from anti-Lutheran Hour parties?

    As I recall, these were phone surveys. The first survey simply asked, "Have you ever listed to the Lutheran Hour?" Virtually no one admitted to it for fear of retaliation. The second survey had the man's voice. People admitted to hearing the voice. Many people said they recognized the voice.
  • It doesn't sound like a particularly robust survey to me, although missionary organisations often claim that their radio broadcasts reach people in Islamic majority countries.

    There are also stories of Muslims in Iran who come to faith in Christ through dreams and such like, and not all these stories come from the usual charismatic suspects as it were.

    I've had some contact with Pakistani Christians in the past and they are desperate for the plight of their fellow believers in their home country to be taken more seriously here in the West.

    I'm pretty sure the situation varies and there are a whole load of factors, influences and regional variations at play as several posters have identified.
  • stetsonstetson Shipmate
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    stetson wrote: »
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    Many years ago, I worked for The Lutheran Hour. We were broadcasting an Arabic version our of Ethiopia into the surrounding Arab countries. We did a survey in some of those countries to see if the intended audience was listening to it. The first survey did not come back well. We then did another survey using the voice of the Arabic translator. That survey indicated quite a few people were hearing his voice. We concluded while the people could not formally admit they had been listening to the program, they were indeed listening.

    I'm not exactly clear about the procedure you're describing here. First off, these were telephone surveys, or surveys conducted via the broadcasts themselves?

    And in the second round of surveys, you mean it was the same voice they heard on the broadcasts asking the question about whether or not people listened to the broadcasts?

    And does "people could not formally admit they had been listening to the program" mean they were afraid of retaliation from the authorities? And, if so, how did having the translator himself reading the questions make a difference? Was it that people recognized his voice, so figured that the survey was coming from The Lutheran Hour, not from anti-Lutheran Hour parties?

    As I recall, these were phone surveys. The first survey simply asked, "Have you ever listed to the Lutheran Hour?" Virtually no one admitted to it for fear of retaliation. The second survey had the man's voice. People admitted to hearing the voice. Many people said they recognized the voice.

    So, in the second survey, was The Lutheran Hour mentioned at all, or were they just asked if they had heard that voice?
  • My only contribution to this was a chat with a foreign diplomat stationed in Yemen who had an informal "Canadian Interests Section" file. The (very) Islamic government generally tolerated the small expatriate and native Christian community, although they suffered attacks on their work (with several RC religious killed), but opposed converts. About five times,Yemeni officials told him that a convert was being detained, primarily to protect them from their families, and could he arrange another country for them. For reasons I couldn't figure out, his country could/would not oblige them, but the old humanitarian and compassionate stream was available and Canadian immigration officials facilitated their move to Canada.

    Given the climatic differences, I hope that they were not sent to Winnipeg in January. If Toronto, there are two good Yemeni restaurants there.

    In the Gulf States, I believe that local sovereigns have donated land for Anglican churches, provided that they did not have externally visible identifiers. The Cyprus and the Gulf website (https://www.cypgulf.org/) provides some interesting material.
  • Gramps49Gramps49 Shipmate
    stetson wrote: »
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    stetson wrote: »
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    Many years ago, I worked for The Lutheran Hour. We were broadcasting an Arabic version our of Ethiopia into the surrounding Arab countries. We did a survey in some of those countries to see if the intended audience was listening to it. The first survey did not come back well. We then did another survey using the voice of the Arabic translator. That survey indicated quite a few people were hearing his voice. We concluded while the people could not formally admit they had been listening to the program, they were indeed listening.

    I'm not exactly clear about the procedure you're describing here. First off, these were telephone surveys, or surveys conducted via the broadcasts themselves?

    And in the second round of surveys, you mean it was the same voice they heard on the broadcasts asking the question about whether or not people listened to the broadcasts?

    And does "people could not formally admit they had been listening to the program" mean they were afraid of retaliation from the authorities? And, if so, how did having the translator himself reading the questions make a difference? Was it that people recognized his voice, so figured that the survey was coming from The Lutheran Hour, not from anti-Lutheran Hour parties?

    As I recall, these were phone surveys. The first survey simply asked, "Have you ever listed to the Lutheran Hour?" Virtually no one admitted to it for fear of retaliation. The second survey had the man's voice. People admitted to hearing the voice. Many people said they recognized the voice.

    So, in the second survey, was The Lutheran Hour mentioned at all, or were they just asked if they had heard that voice?

    Just if they heard the voice which was a pre-taped non-generic greeting from the man.
Sign In or Register to comment.