The 'Mind of The Church', the 'Mind of Christ'

Gamma GamalielGamma Gamaliel Shipmate
edited 10:12AM in Purgatory
In my own church circles there is talk of developing an 'Orthodox mind', or thinking 'Orthodoxly' as it were - of the 'Mind Of The Church'.

We're pretty 'collective' that way ...

And we have a Greek word for it of course, Phronema which is often expressed as The Orthodox Mind.

It tends to be seen as developing a 'built-in' way of thinking that goes beyond intellectual propositions and assent to particular doctrines.

That can apply to Christianity as a whole of course and I am not claiming uniqueness for this concept. I am sure other Christian traditions have their equivalents or do it without thinking (ha ha, see what I did there?) or having a particular name for it, Greek or otherwise.

We read in 1 Corinthians 2:16 that we 'have the mind of Christ'.

My question is this: to what extent is the 'mind of Christ' and the 'mind of the Church' (and yes, we have to think how we define Church of course) commensurate?

If Christ is the 'head' of the Church (and yes, these are metaphors) then that's where our thinking should come from.

So far, so good.

But we all fall short. It's all work in progress.

To take my own Tradition as a case in point. If we think that to be Orthodox means to be superior to everyone else or to look down on others then we aren't really developing Phronema at all. And yes, that happens all too often.

Of course, we all 'see in part and know in part' but I think we'd all agree that we should be striving to exemplify the Sermon on the Mount, the moral teachings of Christ and showing his love and compassion to a broken world.

Not pointing fingers at other people.

Of course, our Lord Himself 'got it right' and we can't because we aren't Christ - but hopefully we are being gradually conformed to his likeness, 'transformed by the renewing of your minds.'

I want to broaden this out more generally and not restrict things to my own Tradition. How can we 'achieve' and 'maintain' the 'Mind of Christ' individually and corporately? The Baptist tradition for instance, has particular insights and views on this from a congregational perspective.

Religious orders may have something specific to bring to the table.

There must be all manner of perspectives on this from which we can all learn.

Over to you.

Comments

  • Gramps49Gramps49 Shipmate
    The ELCA understands the mind of Christ based on Philippians 2: 5-11 understands it to refer to
    Christ's self emptying
    Christ's servanthood
    Christ's Obedience unto death, and
    Christ's exaltation by God.

    It is a communal mindset based on the plural "Let this mind be in you all."

    It is practiced in community
    expressed in mutual care
    discerned together
    and embodied in the life of the congregation.

    We understand the mind of Christ as a call to
    center the neighbor's good
    relinquish status and privilege
    stand with those who suffer
    resist denomination and coercion, and
    embody reconciliation,

    This is way the ELCA social teaching often emphasizes accompaniment, justice and advocacy for the marginalized,
  • Sounds good to me.

    Aspirations I think most of us, I hope would consider worthwhile.

    The sort of thing any Christian church should be working towards.

    Without wishing to get too 'party-line' about these things, would you say there was anything distinctively 'Lutheran' about these aspirations and understandings?

    If so, in what way?

    More broadly, do any of our church structures and ways of working help or hinder the outworking these principles?
  • You mention the Baptist/congregationalist way of collectively "seeking the mind of Christ" in Church Meetings. I have to say that, in practice, many such Meetings are little more than "business meetings" rubber-stamping the church leaders' decisions; or become an excuse for personal opinions and/or party politics to rear their head. The idea that anyone may feel "inspired" to contribute, with their words being quietly "discerned" and evaluated by everyone present, is often lacking. People Church Meetings as an opportunity for democracy which the majority "winning"; however the ideal is for it to be a gradual and prayerful coming-together until consensus is reached.
  • Barnabas62Barnabas62 Shipmate, Host Emeritus
    Personally I think we have more than enough clues about the principles and values underlying what we call the mind of Christ. That’s not necessarily the same as agreement over actions, but it’s a good starting point!

    I understand that collective agreement over actions within the church (locally or more widely) can be hard to achieve but there is much to be said for free collective discussions. Where “top down” gets in the way of that, it may well lead to the mind of the church getting a long way away from the mind of Christ. As history has demonstrated.
  • You mention the Baptist/congregationalist way of collectively "seeking the mind of Christ" in Church Meetings. I have to say that, in practice, many such Meetings are little more than "business meetings" rubber-stamping the church leaders' decisions; or become an excuse for personal opinions and/or party politics to rear their head. The idea that anyone may feel "inspired" to contribute, with their words being quietly "discerned" and evaluated by everyone present, is often lacking. People Church Meetings as an opportunity for democracy which the majority "winning"; however the ideal is for it to be a gradual and prayerful coming-together until consensus is reached.

    Sure. I can see all that but even though I'm in a different place ecclesiastically, I retain a soft-spot for the 'church-meeting' concept as it came as a breath of fresh air after our years in a very 'top-down' restorationist setting which could veer into authoritarianism at times.

    And yes @Barnabas62 and as current events still demonstrate as well as historical examples. (Cough, cough K-k-k-yrill ... cough).

    Other Christian traditions will have their own examples.
  • I retain a soft-spot for the 'church-meeting' concept as it came as a breath of fresh air after our years in a very 'top-down' restorationist setting which could veer into authoritarianism at times.
    Frustration with this model not working properly (and getting clogged with trivia while failing to engage with bigger issues), combined with influence from the Restorationists, led to a "let the leaders lead" move within some Baptist churches in the 1980s. Hopefully we've now achieved a better balance, though most church see only a limited number of people participating in Church Meeting (just like low turnout in political elections!).

Sign In or Register to comment.